Notes from the road, documented by the people who load the van.
Raespoon & Review is a small independent editorial project. We report on the craft and the infrastructure of being a working independent musician — not the personalities, not the charts, not the industry trade gossip.
What the journal does
We publish monthly on the practical questions that working independent musicians actually ask each other at 2am in a motel parking lot: how did you route that tour, how are you paying for the van, where did you get the mics, who taught you to mix vocals, when did you decide to quit your day job, when did you have to take a new one. The answers to these questions shape whole careers, and they almost never make it into the public conversation about music. Our entire editorial mission is to close that gap.
We are not a promotional vehicle. We don’t accept coverage in exchange for compensation from labels, PR firms, or artists. Sponsorships, where they appear, are clearly labeled and editorial content is not reviewed by sponsors before publication. If we recommend a practice, a piece of gear, a producer, or a venue, it is because someone on our editorial staff has used it and can say what worked and what didn’t.
Who writes and edits
The editorial staff are working and former touring musicians, independent producers, session engineers, and music supervisors. Every article is written by someone who has done the work being described — and reviewed by at least one other practitioner before publication. We pay contributors, not industry standard but fair, and we disclose when contributors have any financial or professional relationship with subjects they’re writing about.
Marin Halverson
Founding editor
Former touring musician and current magazine editor. Twelve years on the road, six years in newsrooms. Writes on touring economics and the craft of songwriting.
Elena Coffey
Senior contributor · Recording
Independent producer and recording engineer based out of a home studio in the Pacific Northwest. Writes the DIY recording series.
Theo Grange
Contributor · Scoring & Sync
Music supervisor for independent films and TV. Covers sync licensing, library music, and the slow road to original scoring work.
Editorial process
Every article follows roughly the same path. A writer pitches a specific practice, problem, or piece of reporting — not a general overview. The editor reviews the pitch for specificity and perspective. If accepted, the writer drafts at 1,200 to 2,500 words, interviewing at least one other practitioner when relevant. The draft is reviewed by a subject-matter expert from our contributor network, revised, fact-checked against primary sources (contracts, statutes, published technical documentation), and copy-edited for clarity. Publication follows a monthly issue rhythm with occasional time-sensitive pieces published ahead of schedule.
Name and provenance
The title of the journal is an editorial imprint — it is not the name of any specific artist, label, or organization, and we are not affiliated with any person or entity who may share a similar name. The word was chosen in 2019 for its percussive cadence and the double meaning of a “spoon” as both a mixing tool and a rhythmic device. The “Review” suffix reflects our editorial ambition: to review the actual working conditions of the independent music career, not to score albums or rank artists.
What we are not
We are not a trade publication. We are not an industry newsletter. We are not a review site. We don’t break news. We don’t write profiles. We don’t rank artists. We don’t cover album releases unless the practice behind the release is instructive. We don’t report on awards, signings, or contract leaks. Every one of those is legitimate music journalism, and every one of them is covered by publications that do it well. We cover the other half — the part that is inside the career, rather than about the career.
Support the work
The journal is funded by a small reader subscription (free tier with all articles accessible; paid tier for the annual archive PDF and quarterly print mailing) and by modest sponsorship from companies that make tools working musicians actually use. If you want to support the work, the most valuable thing you can do is share articles with someone who might benefit, or pitch a piece of your own. Our contact page has the guidelines.